Github Identity Switch to n0ctilucent

Franklin directed OpenClaw to stop using the devsecfranklin GitHub account and adopt the n0ctilucent account as the official identity. The n0ctilucent account (user ID 87308972, company "pale shadow") was authenticated via a provided PAT:

Configuration Attempt and Correction

The initial attempt to set tools.github directly in openclaw.json via a raw PAT failed validation:

The config auto-restored from backup. The correct path forward uses the gateway action secrets:set github_oauth_code with a device code from https://github.com/login/device, which triggers the OAuth flow and stores credentials securely in OpenClaw's managed secrets store.

OpenClaw Agent Directory Integrity — Assessment

The ~/.openclaw/agents.entries file was missing entirely on chonk, causing OpenClaw to emit warnings:

"Found 1 agent directory on disk without a matching agents.entries entry."

This means config-driven routing, identity, and model selection would ignore all agent directories. Sessions and auth state still existed on disk but config-driven features were broken.

Agent Directories Found on Disk (20 total)

DirectoryPurpose
mainDefault autonomous orchestration agent
infraLab infrastructure management
authorCreative writing and content generation
puzzlePuzzle-solving and CTF analysis
researchResearch documentation and analysis
websiteWebsite maintenance and publishing
teaching-ismg2050Course page generation and management
panw-stewardPalo Alto firewall policy auditing
database-agentDatabase administration tasks
mc-managerMinecraft server management
mediaMedia generation and processing
genealogyFamily history documentation
jetsonNVIDIA Jetson device management
code-reviewerCode review and static analysis
financeFinancial tracking and analysis
discoveryInfrastructure discovery and reconnaissance
openclawOpenClaw configuration management
anAdditional needs (unspecified)
archiveArchived and retired agent entries

Status

Franklin was presented with the scope of what would be needed to fix (audit vs. auto-generate agents.entries). No action was taken this session — pending user decision on which approach to take.

OpenClaw Full Backup Plan — Design

A tiered backup strategy has been designed for the full OpenClaw workspace (~/.openclaw/), targeting /mnt/clusterfs/openclaw/{date}/:

Tiered Structure

Exclusions (never backed up)

Retention Policy

Keep last 3 dated copies, prune older automatically.

CURRENT BACKUP STATE (Pre-Rotation)

TypeDateSize/Notes
Single file backup2026-10-01 11:04openclaw.json.bak
Manual backup2026-09-29 23:01openclaw.json.manual.bak
Tar.gz archive2026-09-27 10:321.5 GB (oldest)
Tar.gz archive2026-09-30 11:222.4 GB (newest tar.gz, stale for full workspace)

Gap identified: no backup of agent workspaces, memory files, extensions, plugins, or .env exists yet on a dated basis. All existing backups cover only openclaw.json.

Key Questions for Franklin

  1. Which approach as primary? Tar.gz (full point-in-time) or tiered rsync (granular restore)?
  2. Should the clusterfs git repo be part of rotation strategy, or just agent metadata tracking?
  3. Retention confirmed as 3 copies — applied to both tar.gz and dated directories?